We propose sycophancy leads to less discovery and overconfidence through a simple mechanism: When AI systems generate responses that tend toward agreement, they sample examples that coincide with users’ stated hypotheses rather than from the true distribution of possibilities. If users treat this biased sample as new evidence, each subsequent example increases confidence, even though the examples provide no new information about reality. Critically, this account requires no confirmation bias or motivated reasoning on the user’s part. A rational Bayesian reasoner will be misled if they assume the AI is sampling from the true distribution when it is not. This insight distinguishes our mechanism from the existing literature on humans’ tendency to seek confirming evidence; sycophantic AI can distort belief through its sampling strategy, independent of users’ bias. We formalize this mechanism and test it experimentally using a rule discovery task.
Последние новости
，推荐阅读搜狗输入法2026获取更多信息
Фото: Pavel Kashaev / Globallookpress.com
if (thread == null) // 已被唤醒
。旺商聊官方下载对此有专业解读
1月份BD交易数据（单位：万美元），据公开资料整理，更多细节参见WPS下载最新地址
Performance: Supporting thousands of concurrent players was hard